<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasons why Twitter New Retweet Feature Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techonzo.com/2009/11/reasons-why-twitter-new-retweet-feature-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techonzo.com/2009/11/reasons-why-twitter-new-retweet-feature-sucks/</link>
	<description>New shades to Tech Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dcastell</title>
		<link>http://www.techonzo.com/2009/11/reasons-why-twitter-new-retweet-feature-sucks/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Dcastell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techonzo.com/?p=501#comment-135</guid>
		<description>1. if you use the reply link, it replies to the original tweet instead of ur &quot;friend&quot; (sorry for my english)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. if you use the reply link, it replies to the original tweet instead of ur &#8220;friend&#8221; (sorry for my english)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.techonzo.com/2009/11/reasons-why-twitter-new-retweet-feature-sucks/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techonzo.com/?p=501#comment-133</guid>
		<description>1. If you don&#039;t want that, do to their page and press where it says &quot;Retweets fromt his user will appear on your page&quot;, which will change to &quot;Retweets from this user will not appear on your page. It&#039;s quite simple.

2. I agree.

3. What? That&#039;s not a reason. What&#039;s wrong with that? They&#039;re just telling you who retweeted it.

4. I agree with that one too.

5. A &quot;change in definition&quot; isn&#039;t a reason to hate anything. Would you be against women voting because it changes the definition of &quot;voting&quot;? some people were.

So to me you only have two minor reasons to hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. If you don&#8217;t want that, do to their page and press where it says &#8220;Retweets fromt his user will appear on your page&#8221;, which will change to &#8220;Retweets from this user will not appear on your page. It&#8217;s quite simple.</p>
<p>2. I agree.</p>
<p>3. What? That&#8217;s not a reason. What&#8217;s wrong with that? They&#8217;re just telling you who retweeted it.</p>
<p>4. I agree with that one too.</p>
<p>5. A &#8220;change in definition&#8221; isn&#8217;t a reason to hate anything. Would you be against women voting because it changes the definition of &#8220;voting&#8221;? some people were.</p>
<p>So to me you only have two minor reasons to hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfwu</title>
		<link>http://www.techonzo.com/2009/11/reasons-why-twitter-new-retweet-feature-sucks/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>nfwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techonzo.com/?p=501#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Switch to another language interface, and the new Twitter retweets will appear as traditional retweets.
I know this works for the Japanese interface but not sure about the other ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Switch to another language interface, and the new Twitter retweets will appear as traditional retweets.<br />
I know this works for the Japanese interface but not sure about the other ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://www.techonzo.com/2009/11/reasons-why-twitter-new-retweet-feature-sucks/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Beckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techonzo.com/?p=501#comment-129</guid>
		<description>I agree with you wholeheartedly. Twitter&#039;s management is too stupid to realize how vital the traditional retweet is to having meaningful Twitter experiences (see my post on the awesomeness of the retweet: http://is.gd/4PFbJ )

To demonstrate the stupidity of it ... I just found pictures of Paris Hilton in my stream on the internet interface.

I did not come to Twitter to hear the wisdom of Paris Hilton.

The whole thing is ridiculous. The surest way to disappear into a black hole on Twitter, and lose all contact with your Twitter friends, is to use Twitter&#039;s fake retweet button....

1. You can&#039;t comment
2. You can&#039;t edit
3. Your friends won&#039;t know you&#039;ve honored them with a retweet
4. You won&#039;t know when your friends have honored you with a retweet
5. When you see the retweet you won&#039;t know who&#039;s sending it
6. Your friends using Twitter applications instead of the internet interface won&#039;t see anything at all..

It goes on and on.

Surest way to take the social out of social media.

If I were running one of Twitter&#039;s microblogging competitors, like identi.ca or friendfeed, I&#039;m thinking &quot;Twitter just lost its competitive edge... let me move quickly to institutionalize the classic retweet on my site&quot;.

Here&#039;s my article on the subject, advising people that they should totally ignore the Twitter fake retweet button: http://is.gd/4YRfB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you wholeheartedly. Twitter&#8217;s management is too stupid to realize how vital the traditional retweet is to having meaningful Twitter experiences (see my post on the awesomeness of the retweet: <a href="http://is.gd/4PFbJ" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/4PFbJ</a> )</p>
<p>To demonstrate the stupidity of it &#8230; I just found pictures of Paris Hilton in my stream on the internet interface.</p>
<p>I did not come to Twitter to hear the wisdom of Paris Hilton.</p>
<p>The whole thing is ridiculous. The surest way to disappear into a black hole on Twitter, and lose all contact with your Twitter friends, is to use Twitter&#8217;s fake retweet button&#8230;.</p>
<p>1. You can&#8217;t comment<br />
2. You can&#8217;t edit<br />
3. Your friends won&#8217;t know you&#8217;ve honored them with a retweet<br />
4. You won&#8217;t know when your friends have honored you with a retweet<br />
5. When you see the retweet you won&#8217;t know who&#8217;s sending it<br />
6. Your friends using Twitter applications instead of the internet interface won&#8217;t see anything at all..</p>
<p>It goes on and on.</p>
<p>Surest way to take the social out of social media.</p>
<p>If I were running one of Twitter&#8217;s microblogging competitors, like identi.ca or friendfeed, I&#8217;m thinking &#8220;Twitter just lost its competitive edge&#8230; let me move quickly to institutionalize the classic retweet on my site&#8221;.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my article on the subject, advising people that they should totally ignore the Twitter fake retweet button: <a href="http://is.gd/4YRfB" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/4YRfB</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

